Hi Michael,

On Friday, 2008-07-18 11:18:20 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:

>       Secondly - i18n: multiplying the already large number of lang-packs by
> 16 or so is not a good idea: all linux distros go to quite some lengths
> to re-aggregate separated i18n packages. If we split the source, we need
> to re-aggregate all our i18n work. Of course, currently that is
> scattered all over the code-base which (for a split) is not ideal.
> 
>       So - request 2: can we move to a more centralised i18n system - whereby
> we install un-translated src/hrc files to the solver, then run a
> complete translation pass later, to build a single i18n package ? That
> might have the added benefit that we can build a standalone
> translation-pack, to make it (perhaps) simpler to build localisations -
> though this is not my area :-)

Assming you're talking of l10n, not i18n ;-)  effort for
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79750
is ongoing in
http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fl10ncleanup

That seems to be a good starting point.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use 
for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Thanks.

Attachment: pgpFbgWink2LC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to