Hi, > We uploaded a ZMQ publisher/subscriber performer that we will have to take > down because of the licensing terms of ZMQ. > Does that mean that all performers that have inappropriate licensing terms > cannot be build?
We’d need to take a look at it but it may not needed to be "taken down" and is it doesn’t necessarily stop other performers with inappropriate licensing terms from being built. It is possible to have optional products that have licenses that are not compatible with Apache 2.0 license. [1] What we need to do is: 1. Make sure there’s no LGPL licensed code in any of our repos 2. Releases (source or binary) can’t include ZMQ code (or other inappropriate licensed code) Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
