Srinivas and Hadrian, yes we need to accelerate the work on iota. What do we have today?
i) The Fey core component (the engine for iota) ii) A number of components that when wired together (using the iota engine) are used to build micro services iii) documentation included inside the components - typically in the README.md files This is true for the core engine and for a number of components. Suggestions for those that want to contribute to the project 1) Write more documented components so that more micro-services can be build. I have a number of components that I will add to this. Could this start with components that connect to other Apache based components? We can include other technologies outside of Apache if we can include those technologies within an Apache project. 2) Making iota able to run in Akka cluster mode - today’s engine doesn’t do that today it runs on a single machine. We need Akka clustering to enable additional scalability/redundancy beyond a single machine. 3) What would be the best way of running iota on Apache Mesos and how does it relate to 2) ? 4) Write better documentation - it’s one thing to have the documentation for components and the engine. What other documents are needed and who will setup to write them? These are a few thoughts that I have Thanks for moving this project forward I look forward to hearing what is said on these points and ideas that others have. -Tony > On Oct 20, 2016, at 4:43 AM, Shivansh Srivastava <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know there are quite a difference between Beam and IotA , and I am not > comparing the implementation and the use case that they are trying to solve. > All i am saying is that it started just a month after IoTa , and is > constantly being getting better day by day. But the development in IoTa seems > slow. How can we make that fast ? if we can get a better insight in what are > the stories that we have to implement. ? When are we planning the first > release? > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > The first step is exactly what you're doing. Propose improvements and keep > contributing. > > There are many differences between Beam and Iota, we can discuss them if you > want, but this is probably not the right forum. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > > On 10/20/2016 02:15 AM, Shivansh Srivastava wrote: > Hey All, > > i really want to contribute to this project , but the development seems > to be very slow. > The project started on*2016-01-20 *at the same time as the project > *Apache-beam* has started dated: > *2016-02-01. > > * > And Apache beam is continously getting better and better each day, but i > do not see that much activity on IoTA. You can see the Commit Graph over > the period and compare : > * > * > *Apache Beam: > > > * > *Apache IoTA: > > > > > * > I am just concerned where are we headed? > > We have two to three members who are really interested in contributing > to this project. Hence if someone can show us the right path in which we > can contribute that would be great! > Also if someone can*let us know the procedure of becoming the Apache > IotA Commitor* that would be perfect ! > > Thanks > -- > /Best Regards | Shivansh/ > /Software Consultant// / > */Knoldus Software LLP/* > > /India - US - Canada// > Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/shiv4nsh <http://www.twitter.com/shiv4nsh>> > | FB > <http://www.facebook.com/xeruo <http://www.facebook.com/xeruo>> | LinkedIn > <https://in.linkedin.com/pub/shivansh-srivastava/3a/204/251 > <https://in.linkedin.com/pub/shivansh-srivastava/3a/204/251>>/ > > > > -- > Best Regards | Shivansh > Software Consultant > Knoldus Software LLP > > India - US - Canada > Twitter <http://www.twitter.com/shiv4nsh> | FB > <http://www.facebook.com/xeruo> | LinkedIn > <https://in.linkedin.com/pub/shivansh-srivastava/3a/204/251>
