Hi, many projects use the Jira release feature for managing the tickets /features that should go into a release. So I think it could help to ensure that all activity is mirrored in Jira issues where we can decide which one to include for the release and what not.
Regarding release notes I think we can start simple with the project description and a general project overview and perhaps a list of recently added features. A good start could be to borrow a release notes file from some other project as basis. @chris: are all the maven profiles similar to plc4x or are changes necessary? Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of IoTDB this month? Von: Xiangdong Huang An: [email protected] Cc: Hi, > We can make a release plan in the dev list first. I read the document that Chris gave last month, http://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release.html In brief, there are four steps: (1) setting Maven configuration; (2) creating the release branch and prepare the codebase; (3) mvn release and deploy and so on; (4) vote. I think we need to discuss the second step, creating a release branch: (1) which functions are included in this release (I mean, what functions are not prepared for release, and is the release version is consistent with current document)? (2) prepare the release-note. Can someone share with us the best practice to generate a release note? (I have no experience about that...) Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Willem Jiang <[email protected]> 于2019年3月9日周六 上午10:27写道： > We can make a release plan in the dev list first. > From my experience , there are lots of details need to go through in > the first preview version. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:16 PM Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That's Great! A binary release version is really needed! > > > > And, if so, at least users can get iotdb-jdbc jars from Maven central > > repository... > > > > Best, > > ----------------------------------- > > Xiangdong Huang > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > 黄向东 > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 于2019年3月8日周五 下午3:29写道： > > > > > I think that's a good idea, > > > > > > I think I might start pre-reviewing the current state ... No need in > > > listing findings after a RC. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 8:03:46 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: AW: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > > > IoTDB this month? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think a (first apache) release is a good idea. Especially to allow > > > people to play around with the artifacts. > > > > > > After what I have seen the code quality is good and the main > functionality > > > works well. > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- > > > Betreff: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > > > IoTDB this month? > > > Von: 吴晟 Sheng Wu > > > An: dev ,dev > > > Cc: > > > > > > I think we should try to do a release. At least a preview version. 3 > > > months are not short time for a new project. > > > Of source, no rush, just when you think it is ready and make sense. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu > > > Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin > > > > > > From Wu Sheng 's phone. > > > > > > > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > > > From: yi xu <[email protected]> > > > Date: Fri,Mar 8,2019 11:09 AM > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of > > > IoTDB this month? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Over the last three months, we have improved IoTDB in several ways, > such > > > as code quality, document and read/write performance. So should we > release > > > a normal version to our users since we don’t have a normal version > right > > > now. > > > > > > Thanks > > > XuYi > > > >
