Hi Xiangdong, you can ask for a VM from Infra, if this is needed. We did that for the PLC4X project as we needed to do network stuff infra didn't want to have on it's official nodes.
And I agree having master and develop branches is a very good thing. Chris Am 10.04.19, 05:12 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>: Hi, Sadly, a long term test failed, see the JIRA for more details [1]. The problem is caused by the modification file management, which is introduced in PR [2]. Firstly, we need to fix this bug ASAP, otherwise the master branch does not work...... ( @Tian Jiang, the author of PR [2]). And then we can keep go on for the release version. Secondly, it shows that for a DB, just a UT/IT test with JUnit is not enough. Instead, a long term test is always needed once the main branch of code is updated... It seems that there is no such a public platform can support long term test. I think we can open our lib's test environment for IoTDB if needed. Thirdly, it is time to enable the dev branch... (I remember that Julian shared a link to introduce the functionality of the mater branch and dev branch). We need to keep the master branch is stable all the time, and develop in the dev branch. If we enable that, we need to quickly resolve current bug to make the master branch stable, and moving all PRs to the dev branch, rather than the master branch.. Best, [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/IOTDB/issues/IOTDB-79 [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/17 ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2019年4月3日周三 上午10:31写道： > Hi, > > Now: > - The Polding name search has finished [1] > - The license self-check is finished [2] > > And we have some tasks left: > - (1) prepare the final code version. > - (2) modify the changes file (we have an initial version) > - (3) begin to vote... > > For task (1) and (2): > > The following PRs have opened for several days, if there is no other > feedback, I will merge them: > > #79 [IOTDB-6]Value filter query optimization > #97 [IOTDB-47][IOTDB-54][IOTDB-59][IOTDB-60]Aggregate+GroupBy+Fill > #111 try to release memory asap in ReadOnlyMemChunk > #123 provide unified query resource control interface > > Then I will start a long-term test (at least 5 days) with a heavy write > workload for checking whether the current version is stable.... > > If everything is fine, we can begin task (2) and add a tag on the > repository and finish task (1) and (2). And then, begin (3)... > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9d26c2eab119d345a542edd5bc5a657d451fbd1a92b33bad1fd74af5@%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2bb4abd5a1cf9961dfbe50182bcf7cb39fcd408baa5b90fe4ddb0bd3@%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 >
