Just a short notice we should call it `develop` not `dev`.
At least my opiniton : )

Am 08.07.19, 15:19 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>:

    Hi all,
    
    Does anyone has opinions for putting the releasing process at the top of
    the agendas?
    
    If there is no more opinions, I will start the first step: open a vote for
    moving the `master` branch into the `dev`.
    
    Best,
    -----------------------------------
    Xiangdong Huang
    School of Software, Tsinghua University
    
     黄向东
    清华大学 软件学院
    
    
    Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年7月8日周一 下午9:04写道:
    
    > Hi Xiangdong,
    >
    >
    >
    > no hurry, and no need to make yourself pressure.
    >
    > You are really doing a LOT for the project.
    >
    >
    >
    > For me there are only two reasons why I contribute to IoTDB.
    >
    > First, I spent a lot of thoughts about a “more time series ready” Parquet,
    > so you did it and its time to support that.
    >
    > Second, I really like to use it in our stack.
    >
    > And perhaps also third, I love the ASF and like to improve the coverage on
    > the iot ecosystem.
    >
    >
    >
    > But I’ll try to give you as many hints or advices as possible to help you
    > get the release done, that’s for sure!
    >
    >
    >
    > Julian
    >
    >
    >
    > *Von: *Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]>
    > *Datum: *Montag, 8. Juli 2019 um 15:01
    > *An: *Julian Feinauer <[email protected]>
    > *Betreff: *Re: Start the release train
    >
    >
    >
    > Hi Julian,
    >
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your understanding. Actually Chris show his opinion for the
    > nomination but the objector did not reply ...
    >
    >
    >
    > I know the importance of collaboration, and I am trying to do some work
    > for making Apache IoT projects more closely.
    >
    > (Recently I finished a demo by connecting a Mitsubishi PLC and reading
    > data using PLC4j and writing data into IoTDB. I am transferring the
    > document into English..)
    >
    > For me, I absolutely agree with absorbing more IoT guys into the
    > community.
    >
    >
    >
    > Anyway, thanks for your guidance once again and I will reopen the
    > nomination soon~
    >
    >
    >
    > Best,
    >
    > -----------------------------------
    >
    > Xiangdong Huang
    >
    > School of Software, Tsinghua University
    >
    >
    >
    >  黄向东
    >
    > 清华大学 软件学院
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年7月8日周一 下午8:09写道:
    >
    > Hi Xiangdong,
    >
    >
    >
    > thank you for the email and the honest words.
    >
    > I value that (and your work overall) a lot!
    >
    >
    >
    > Every PMC has to set its own understanding and guidelines so its
    > absolutely fine for me, that this got vetoed.
    >
    > I am trying to contribute as much as possible but I’m currently lacking a
    > bit of time due to other stuff I earn my money with : )
    >
    >
    >
    > I think its up to you to consider if reopening is a chance or not but I
    > see it relaxed.
    >
    > I would be happy to help with the release (or do the RM) but if someone
    > else does it its also fine.
    >
    >
    >
    > But, I guess as you’re a pretty young PMC it is important to sort out
    > those things like “when do we consider someone established enough to 
become
    > committer / ppmc”, “what is a contribution? Is it only PRs or also 
activity
    > on the list and others”.
    >
    > One tip I can give you (you and the complete PPMC) is to be open to
    > integrate others (not only myself) because you need to grow.
    >
    > ASF is all about collaboration and not so much about “walled inner
    > circles” or something.
    >
    >
    >
    > Someone you can always rely on with those kind of questions is Christofer
    > Dutz who is one of your mentors and seasoned apache veteran (and member).
    >
    > So perhaps he can help you and the ppmc also in private@ with this kind
    > of discussions.
    >
    >
    >
    > Julian
    >
    >
    >
    > PS.: One thing I can give you as starting point towards guidance for the
    > release is our “Release Guideline” from the PLC4X project we use
    > https://plc4x.apache.org/developers/release.html
    >
    >
    >
    > *Von: *Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]>
    > *Datum: *Montag, 8. Juli 2019 um 14:02
    > *An: *Julian Feinauer <[email protected]>
    > *Betreff: *Re: Start the release train
    >
    >
    >
    > Hi Julian,
    >
    >
    >
    > I write this mail in private because I want to tell you that about two
    > weeks ago, I nominated you as a committer (I think you may know about that
    > because I sent the email to the dev@ rather than private@ by mistake..).
    >
    >
    >
    > I know you are active in the community and have tried to use IoTDB/TsFile
    > and improved it. And,  I listed the 2 PRs you contributed in the 
nomination
    > mail.
    >
    > However, someone said that your PRs is not so enough... I had to terminate
    > the voting... :(
    >
    >
    >
    > All the above happens on the private@, that is why I write this mail to
    > you in private.
    >
    >
    >
    > So, I am not sure that whether should I re-propose a new vote to nominate
    > you as a committer...
    >
    >
    >
    > By the way, I think that if you can guide us finishing the release, or
    > bring more PRs, I will have more evidence to re-nominate again...
    >
    >
    >
    > Hope to know your opinion.
    >
    >
    >
    > Best,
    >
    > -----------------------------------
    >
    > Xiangdong Huang
    >
    > School of Software, Tsinghua University
    >
    >
    >
    >  黄向东
    >
    > 清华大学 软件学院
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年7月8日周一 下午5:30写道:
    >
    > Hi Xiangdong,
    >
    > thanks for your response (which I personally value a lot).
    > It's good that you agree and hopefully some others will join the
    > discussion soon.
    >
    > I just spoke with Chris who did a lot for the maven build. And as it is
    > conceptually the same build (from the maven side) than we used in PLC4X I
    > can offer to do the release manager (RM) for the release. I've done 
several
    > releases now and would try to make a documentation parallel to this 
release
    > to make it easier for others to follow.
    > Releasing is a bit cumbersome until you've done it several times, then you
    > get used to it : )
    >
    > The only problem is that I am no committer so I would need the support of
    > someone from the PMC to help with release branch / release tags. I'm 
unsure
    > if the rest (nexus and stuff) works as I'm PMC elsewhere.
    >
    > Julian
    >
    > Am 08.07.19, 05:25 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>:
    >
    >     Hi,
    >
    >     +1.
    >
    >     According to my known test result, I think the current version is
    > stable,
    >     and the performance is far better than the previous ( more than 5X).
    >
    >     The only thing the current version left is the data sync module and 
the
    >     compaction modules. They are not so critical for a IoTDB instance in
    > many
    >     scenarios. (But hope that we can finish them ASAP).
    >
    >     Releasing a formal version is beneficial for the project, though we
    > have to
    >     consider the compatibility among versions.
    >
    >     How about others' opinion?
    >
    >     Best,
    >     -----------------------------------
    >     Xiangdong Huang
    >     School of Software, Tsinghua University
    >
    >      黄向东
    >     清华大学 软件学院
    >
    >
    >     Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年7月8日周一 上午2:20写道:
    >
    >     > Hi all,
    >     >
    >     > When I checked the list I noticed several threads and discussions
    > about
    >     > releasing.
    >     > I think we should start to work on a first ASF release really soon.
    >     >
    >     > This will not only make it easier for users to adopt and play around
    > with
    >     > iotdb but this will also make the project more mature with regards 
to
    >     > licensing and stuff.
    >     >
    >     > What do others think?
    >     > I think it would not be a bad idea to start a rel/0.8 branch soon
    > where
    >     > all stabilization happens so that develop can continue as usual in
    > main
    >     > branch.
    >     >
    >     > Are there any serious things keeping us from doing so?
    >     >
    >     > Julian
    >     >
    >     > Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
    >     >
    >
    >
    

Reply via email to