Hi,

The performance of the tool should be improved...

I think a user has no patience if the tool takes more than  several seconds
(at most several minutes) for a workload which has hundreds of millions of
time series...

Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University

 黄向东
清华大学 软件学院


李天安 <[email protected]> 于2019年7月17日周三 下午4:57写道:

> Hi, Jialin:
> Actually, I have written an docu to show how to use this tool, and it has
> been submitted to this pr.
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/256 <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/256>
>
> Best Regards,
> —————————————————
> Tianan Li
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 李天安
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> > 在 2019年7月17日,下午4:44,Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 写道:
> >
> > Hi Tianan,
> >
> > Nice work, This is very useful!
> >
> > Could you add an example (command) about how to use this tool?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >> -----原始邮件-----
> >> 发件人: "李天安" <[email protected]>
> >> 发送时间: 2019-07-17 14:57:51 (星期三)
> >> 收件人: [email protected]
> >> 抄送:
> >> 主题: Memory estimation tool
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> Recently, I participated in the development of the dynamic parameter
> adapter module[https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/232], which
> can dynamically adjust system parameters according to load conditions. When
> we have the above module, I think we can develop a cooler thing: the memory
> estimation tool. When users provide the number of storage groups and
> timeseries according to the workload, the memory estimation tool can give
> the minimum memory for writing to meet the workload.
> >>
> >>
> >> I think this tool is very useful and I have started to develop it [
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/256].
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone interested in this tool can discuss it here together.
> >>
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> —————————————————
> >> Tianan Li
> >> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to