Hi,

Many thanks for your report, and glad to see the better query performance
of IoTDB.

Actually, I think IoTDB's write performance can also be far better than
InfluxDB. Just try to tune two parameters that you listed, and I have
pointed out how to tune them on JIRA.

Look forward to your new report.

By the way, IoTDB v0.8 has at least 50% write performance improvement :p

Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University

 黄向东
清华大学 软件学院


[email protected] <[email protected]> 于2019年7月25日周四
下午5:02写道:

> I've uploaded the report on jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-155. Please go to jira for
> detail.
>
> ------------------------------
> [email protected]
>
>
> *From:* Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]>
> *Date:* 2019-07-25 13:49
> *To:* dev <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: IoTDB vs InfluxDB Benchmark Report
> Hi,
>
> Many thanks for the topic, but mailing list does not support the
> attachment...
>
> How about upload it to IoTDB confluence or just open an JIRA issue to
> discuss about that.
>
> Best,
>
> [email protected] <[email protected]>于2019年7月25日
> 周四上午11:49写道:
>
> > hello,
> >
> >      Here is the IoTDB vs InfluxDB benchmark test report, which contains
> > the write, read, and compression performance test.
> >      You can check the annex for detail.
> >      Best wishes :-)
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > [email protected]
> >
> --
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>

Reply via email to