Hi Chris,

> If you want, I could make things more standard compliant.

It could not be better!

Best,
-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University

 黄向东
清华大学 软件学院


Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> 于2019年8月3日周六 下午11:48写道:

> Hi Xiangdong,
>
> good catch with with libs in the source ... as much as I hate to say it
> ... I have to change my vote :-(
> Even if it sort of puzzles me how this could happen. Usually the release
> plugin checks out clean into target/checkout and runs the "mvn deploy -P
> apache-release" there ... as the source bundle is built first, the libs
> should have been empty.
> Unless someone checked out the tagged version an ran the build again.
>
> This is one of the side-effects I mentioned were a result of the
> redirecting of standard plugins outputs.
>
> If you want, I could make things more standard compliant.
>
>
> Chris
>
> Am 03.08.19, 17:30 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I checked the bin.zip and source-code.zip and then find that:
>
>     - NOTICE file shows "Apache Hive Copyright 2008-2019 The Apache
> Software
>     Foundation" while NOTICE-binary file shows "Apache Hive Copyright
> 2008-2018
>     The Apache Software Foundation" (I also checked github.com/apache/hive,
> and
>     found it should be 2018..)
>
>     - tools/start-WalChecker.sh or .bat: the script can only check
>     $IOTDB_HOME$/data/wal folder... I submit a PR #330 to fix that.
>
>     - the other scripts in bin.zip work well.. But I noticed that the
>     source-code.zip (~26MB) is larger than bin.zip (~10MB)... After
> checking
>     the subfolders, I find that server/iotdb/lib and client/cli/lib have
>     jars... Do we need to remove them out of the source-code.zip file?
>
>     Best,
>     -----------------------------------
>     Xiangdong Huang
>     School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
>      黄向东
>     清华大学 软件学院
>
>
>     Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年8月3日周六 下午9:29写道:
>
>     > Hi Chris,
>     >
>     > When thinking about it, I definitely agree.
>     > I just copied over the mail template from an other poling where it
> was
>     > created from an apache member which may not be named here :P
>     >
>     > But +1.
>     >
>     > Julian
>     >
>     > Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
>     >
>     >
>     > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>     > Betreff: [DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC2
>     > Von: Christofer Dutz
>     > An: [email protected]
>     > Cc:
>     >
>     > Hi …
>     >
>     > I do have a proposal for future release-candidates:
>     > I think the link usually posted as [2] should be [1] in the future.
>     > The reason is that this IS THE RELEASE … the current Maven artifacts
> in
>     > [1] are convenience binaries distributed by the PPMC.
>     > Also might it make people think, this is what they have to verify
> and not
>     > what’s currently in [2].
>     >
>     > Will now start verifying the RC2 …
>     >
>     > Chris
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to