Tian Jiang created IOTDB-162:
--------------------------------
Summary: Fix the semantics of hasNext() and next().
Key: IOTDB-162
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-162
Project: Apache IoTDB
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Tian Jiang
Attachments: image-2019-08-14-09-50-05-929.png
Some definitions of hasNext() and next() are misleading, for example, the
following actually means hasCurrent rather than hasNext, say, when curIdx =
timeLength - 1, it will true while actually there is not the next value.
Such definitions conflict the hasNext() and next() defined and widely used in
Java Iterator, and cause confusion to those who are not so familiar with the
code.
!image-2019-08-14-09-50-05-929.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)
