Hi, I do not know why the mail does not show the description...
> As suggested by Jialin Qiao, an ideal case may be that ChunkMetaData.offsetOfChunkHeader refers to the position AFTER Marker_1 too. +1. > A solution is changing the name of the parameter from `markerRead` to `isMarkerExist` The correct meaning of the parameter should be `has the Marker been read`. If it is true, then the reader do not need to read 1 byte. I suggest to make the inconsistency to the above meaning. Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Lei Rui (Jira) <[email protected]> 于2019年9月19日周四 下午1:27写道： > Lei Rui created IOTDB-229: > ----------------------------- > > Summary: Inconsistent usage of Marker in TsFile > Key: IOTDB-229 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-229 > Project: Apache IoTDB > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Lei Rui > > > > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > (v8.3.4#803005) >
