Hi,
Change definitions in rpc.thrift should be careful.
For example, you have jdbc with 0.8.0 and iotdb with 0.8.1 whose rpc.thrit
are a little bit different. It is most likely that you cannot use jdbc with
0.8.0 to connect iotdb with 0.8.1 since they are not compatible. This may
confuse our users why two 0.8.x are not compatible？
Therefore, i would suggest that if there is no great improvement, the
original definitions should be remained.
Thanks
XuYi
On 9/19/2019 20:03，孙泽嵩<sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> wrote：
Hi,
I have renamed some variable and struct names in RPC in PR [1]:
Rename TS_Status to TSStatus;
Rename TS_StatusType to TSStatusType;
Use TSStatus to replace TSRPCRsp. (Since it only contains TSStatus field)
If you are working on JDBC or session, please pull latest master code to avoid
more conflicts.
Besides, if any people changed RPC, remember to maintain the file
`rpc-changelist.md` in service-rpc module. It is helpful for other developers :
)
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/404
BR,
--
Zesong Sun
School of Software, Tsinghua University
孙泽嵩
清华大学 软件学院
