Hi Kevin, > Question: The release notes don't mention the speed increase. I thought > there was a substantial speed increase with 0.8.1. Did I misunderstand that?
The 0.8.1 is just a bug-fix version of 0.8.0, so there isn't any speed increasing. Indeed we have a substantial speed increase over 0.8.0, which will be contained in the 0.9.0. Looking forward to the release of 0.9.0 :) > Question: Should the client script be in an sbin directory? I would think > just bin would be better. Not a release blocker. +1, we could change it later. Like Spark did, sbin includes the server script and bin includes client or tools script. Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Kevin A. McGrail" <[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2019-10-11 22:09:28 (星期五) > 收件人: [email protected] > 抄送: > 主题: Re: [discussion] Release of IoTDB 0.8.1 RC2 > > I vote +1 having followed this list: > > downloaded pre-release/iotdb-0.8.1 rc2 binary release from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/iotdb/0.8.1/rc2/apache-iotdb-0.8.1-incubating-bin.zip > > confirmed sha512 matches > 604a9ba330237766f8f3488a13cde63b573ad005f29a3f9748535a5ad65324b5fc75c25d44f805b44919f2b1405fe4889905f0e31948cf13beade48644d08263 > apache-iotdb-0.8.1-incubating-bin.zip > > > I Looked at the NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER > I loooked at the README.md and the RELEASE_NOTES.md > > Question: The release notes don't mention the speed increase. I thought > there was a substantial speed increase with 0.8.1. Did I misunderstand that? > > ran start iotdb server > start client > > Question: Should the client script be in an sbin directory? I would think > just bin would be better. Not a release blocker. > > Executed the following successfully. > SET STORAGE GROUP TO root.ln.wf01.wt01; > CREATE TIMESERIES root.ln.wf01.wt01.status WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, > ENCODING=PLAIN > CREATE TIMESERIES root.ln.wf01.wt01.temperature WITH DATATYPE=FLOAT, > ENCODING=PLAIN > CREATE TIMESERIES root.ln.wf01.wt01.hardware WITH DATATYPE=INT32, > ENCODING=PLAIN > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(1, 1.1, false, 11) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(2, 2.2, true, 22) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(3, 3.3, false, 33 ) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(4, 4.4, false, 44) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(5, 5.5, false, 55) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(6, 1.1, false, 11) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(7, 2.2, true, 22) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(8, 3.3, false, 33 ) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(9, 4.4, false, 44) > INSERT INTO root.ln.wf01.wt01(timestamp,temperature,status, hardware) > values(10, 5.5, false, 55) > Select * from root; > > I did not do the source release as my system is not working correctly with > mvn but based on others feedback, I feel confident in the binary release test. > > Regards, > KAM > > On 10/10/2019 9:48 PM, Xiangdong Huang wrote: > > Hi kevin, > > > > Ah, as after the voting in this mailing list, we still need to vote on > > general@ to get at least 3 +1 from IPMCs. > > But I noticed that when Julian released 0.8.0 and got more than 3 +1 from > > IPMCs in [email protected] mail list, > > he started a new lazy vote in the general@, which I thought it is because > > there were 3 IPMCs voting it already. > > I think it is convenient.. > > > > Best, > > ----------------------------------- > > Xiangdong Huang > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > 黄向东 > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 于2019年10月11日周五 上午9:01写道： > > > >> Are we needed for a release vote? I usually like to make sure you guys > >> are doing things correctly and try to leave you to your own devices... > >> > >> On 10/10/2019 8:49 PM, Xiangdong Huang wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> There are 7 PPMCs voting for the release now. How about IPMC and mentors? > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> ----------------------------------- > >>> Xiangdong Huang > >>> School of Software, Tsinghua University > >>> > >>> 黄向东 > >>> 清华大学 软件学院 > >>> > >>> > >>> Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2019年10月9日周三 下午2:21写道： > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> There are 3 PPMCs voting for the release now. How about other PPMCs? > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> ----------------------------------- > >>>> Xiangdong Huang > >>>> School of Software, Tsinghua University > >>>> > >>>> 黄向东 > >>>> 清华大学 软件学院 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 于2019年10月8日周二 上午11:13写道： > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>>> (Learnt from Julian: if we can get 3 votes from IPMCs, e.g., from our > >>>>>> mentors, then it will be an easy task to get votes from general@ mail > >>>>> list) > >>>>>> (The holiday of National Day of China is over, so Chinese guys, PPMC > >>>>>> especially, it is your time. :D > >>>>> I’d like the see a few PPMC votes on this before the mentors, once you > >>>>> become a top level project you won’t have mentors so need to learn how > >> to > >>>>> do this and what to look for yourselves. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Justin > >> -- > >> Kevin A. McGrail > >> [email protected] > >> > >> Member, Apache Software Foundation > >> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > >> > >> > -- > Kevin A. McGrail > [email protected] > > Member, Apache Software Foundation > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
