Hi all, I think we'll probably run into similar problems whenever IoT data is to be stored in a DB. I think IoTDB is safe from the side that no other organization will be able to deny us the usage of the name. But I doubt the ASF will be able to enforce the name, if someone uses it. Especially if it's written with a space, like: "IoT DB".
So I wouldn't explicitly mention any of these branding issues. Chris Am 02.12.19, 08:47 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]>: Hi, > How about the following: > > Required Name Search is done. > On Google Search: > 1. There is a dataset called "iotdb" (Internet of Things Database, from > http://www.green-ic.org/). The last update date is 2017-08-16. > 2. There was a project called IoTDB, whose website is iotdb.org. But the > website can not be accessed. (But the registry expiry date is 2020-05-27). > A related project called iotdb-mqtt (on NPM) is also not maintained. > That a bit too detailed to go into the report, I’d just say something along the lines of "a google search didn’t show any major branding issues that the PPMC needs to deal with." This is something that the PMC need to monitor and take action on if something does come up. Thanks, Justin
