Sorry, I didn't make my proposal clear. My proposal didn't say to give up "responsive layout". My proposal is to fix all bugs while supporting "responsive layout", such as: in case of [1], the menu text wrap according to the window size is already using “responsive layout"”, it's just that line height is not set, which leads to bugs.
My proposal is consider our IoTDB website style from a global perspective and add specific attribute configurations for specific components. such as add a `line-height` style for the whole website. Best, Jincheng [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12989445/12989445_image-2019-12-25-11-26-45-754.png Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月25日周三 下午1:09写道： > Hi, > > > My proposal is: Remove all adaptive styles(such as: justify, default > height, default width etc.), and add specific attribute configurations for > specific components(Consider our IoTDB website style from a global > perspective). > > I am not an expert of front-end tech. If we "remove all adaptive styles", > is the website still "Responsive Layout"? > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> 于2019年12月25日周三 下午12:11写道： > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I've been focusing on IoTDB for a while. I think the IoTDB architecture > and > > the vision of solving the practical problems in the IOT scenario are very > > great, so I'm very interested in this project. The only feeling is that > at > > present, the number of community participants in IoTDB is not too many. > We > > should not only use excellent architecture and great vision to attract > more > > excellent people to participate in IoTDB, but also let's people who come > to > > know IoTDB through the website are attracted by the details of IoTDB. The > > problems, no matter how big or small, will reflect the community's > pursuit > > of IoTDB, especially the details will reflect the spirit of IoTDB > > excellence. So although the problems I put forward are easy to fix, I > don't > > mean to pick up problems and express that IoTDB is not good, but I want > to > > help the IoTDB community grow and improve, and do better in details. I > also > > believe that IoTDB will develop better and better! > > > > So, I will lead to my proposal with two specific questions: > > > > - When we narrow the window, there will be problems in our display, as > > shown in the [1][5], and we can add the height attribute to solve this > > problem, as shown in [2]. > > - Can not show the menu if we narrow the window, detail can be found in > [3] > > [6] > > > > The above are two specific problems. My suggestion is to consider the > > overall style principle of the website from the perspective of the > overall > > situation, so as to avoid the endless small problems. The similar > problems > > have been solved before, such as [4]. So my proposal is as follows: > > > > My proposal is: Remove all adaptive styles(such as: justify, default > > height, default width etc.), and add specific attribute configurations > for > > specific components(Consider our IoTDB website style from a global > > perspective). > > > > I appreciate if anyone like to make this nice improvement ! > > > > What do you think? > > > > Best, > > Jincheng > > > > [1] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12989445/12989445_image-2019-12-25-11-26-45-754.png > > [2] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12989444/12989444_image-2019-12-25-11-27-34-645.png > > [3] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12989447/12989447_image-2019-12-25-11-32-47-738.png > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-384 > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-390 > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-391 > > >
