[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17048606#comment-17048606 ]
Julian Feinauer commented on IOTDB-528: --------------------------------------- Yes, indeed I know. I already scratched one for grafana which works reasonably well... but currently i try to have one that creates the snapshot also : ) {code:java} FROM openjdk:11-jre-slim LABEL maintainer="j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de" RUN mkdir /iotdb ADD application.properties /iotdb/ ADD iotdb-grafana-0.10.0-SNAPSHOT.war /iotdb/ EXPOSE 8888 WORKDIR /iotdb/ ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-Dspring.datasource.url=jdbc:iotdb://${IOTDB_HOST}:6667", "-jar", "/iotdb/iotdb-grafana-0.10.0-SNAPSHOT.war"] {code} > [GRAFANA] Implicitly do GROUP BY to avoid sending to many data over the wire > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: IOTDB-528 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-528 > Project: Apache IoTDB > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Connectors/Grafana > Reporter: Julian Feinauer > Priority: Major > Labels: performance > > When using itodb-grafana integration through SimpleJson it seems like it does > not do any aggregation at all. > In situations where one selects a big time range it should do some > subsampling with group by to limit the number of rows being sent. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)