Possible structure:

*Community*
 - how to contribute
 - how to release
 - how to invite new PPMC & Committer (templates for nominating)
 - powered by
 - versioning policy

*Design Documents*

*Ecosystem*
 - official connectors
 - third party projects

*Weekly report*
 - 2020.03.23~2020.03.30


Others could be put on the website.

- Xin

Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 于2020年3月25日周三 下午12:03写道:

> Hi,
>
> Does someone have ideas about this?
>
> Thanks,
> —————————————————
> Jialin Qiao
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> 乔嘉林
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
>
> Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 于2020年3月22日周日 下午8:48写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > As for the finalized doc, we could just refer to the GitHub repository.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > > There exist many blank pages (for example release history, white paper,
> > resources, …) Should we fill the content?
> >
> > They could be removed.
> >
> > From my side, the wiki acts more like shared notes for developers, so I
> > prefer to make the wiki as simple as possible.
> >
> > I adjust some items:
> >
> > (1) The IoT ecosystem or New TsFile is either user guide or design
> > documents.
> > (2) The paper could be downloaded from the website, so I removed it from
> > the wiki.
> >
> > The folder could be like this:
> >
> > ---- Design Document
> >       | ---- Unpublished design doc
> >
> > ---- Weekly report
> >
> > ---- Community
> >       | ---- Email templates for nominating new PPMC & Committer
> >       | ---- How to release a version
> >       | ---- How to validate a release candidate
> >
> > ---- Metting notes (maybe this could be put to the website)
> >
> > ---- Performance test report (The performance of the released version
> > could be put to the website)
> >       | ---- Performance test of PR-xxx
> >       | ---- Performance test of version-xxx
> >
> > Thanks,
> > —————————————————
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >
> > 孙泽嵩 <[email protected]> 于2020年3月22日周日 下午8:24写道:
> >
> >> Hi Dawei,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your proposal. I totally agree with you. We may maintain some
> >> unpublished design documents which are still under discussion in wiki
> page.
> >> As for the finalized doc, we could just refer to the GitHub repository.
> >>
> >> There exist many blank pages (for example release history, white paper,
> >> resources, …) Should we fill the content? I notice that they are not
> >> mentioned in Dawei’s propose  catalogs.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> -----------------------------------
> >> Zesong Sun
> >> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >>
> >> 孙泽嵩
> >> 清华大学 软件学院
> >>
> >> > 2020年3月22日 15:56,Dawei Liu <[email protected]> 写道:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > The day before yesterday I copy the weekly news into wiki, I found the
> >> document structure is not very clear,
> >> > so want to rearrange the wiki document structure.
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to discuss a few questions before doing that, what a wiki is
> >> for, and what differentiates it from the site (iotdb.apache.org).
> >> >
> >> > My personal opinion is that it is more like a notebook in our growing
> >> up,
> >> > which can publish some notes before we decide,
> >> > such as the design document to new Tsfile, or the test report during
> >> our optimization process, etc.
> >> > which is not suitable for publishing on the official website.
> >> >
> >> > So I organized several hierarchical catalogs:
> >> >
> >> > ---- Community
> >> >      | ---- Weekly news
> >> >      | ---- PPMC & Committer
> >> >      | ----  …. and more
> >> >
> >> > ---- IoT ecosystem
> >> >      | ---- Flink
> >> >      | ---- MQTT
> >> >
> >> > ---- Document
> >> >      | ---- Unpublished design doc
> >> >
> >> > ---- Metting notes
> >> >      | ---- xxxx
> >> >
> >> > ---- Parer,feature
> >> >      | ---- PISA
> >> >      | ---- New TsFile
> >> >      | ---- Performance test
> >> >
> >> > ---- Apache Governance
> >> >      | ---- how to release a version
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Looking forward to your reply
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > ---
> >> > Dawei Liu
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Xin

Reply via email to