Hi, If you call the batch insertion of Data 1 as insertRows(), why not call the batch insertion of Data 2 as insertColumns()? or, insertAlignedColumns();
> RowBatch -> SeriesBatch or ColumnBatch I think the name is not clear. Is there better suggestion? Data 1: row1: time, device1, s1, s2 row2: time, device2, s3, s4 Data 2: device1 time, s1, s2, s3 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Haonan Hou <[email protected]> 于2020年4月18日周六 下午1:39写道： > Hi, > > +1. The new way of naming seems more straight forward. > > Thanks, > Haonan > > > > On Apr 18, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The native API Session provides many methods. However, their names are > > confusing. For example, insertBatch and insertInBatch. > > > > (1) insertBatch actually receives a RowBatch structure, which contains > data > > of multiple measurements of a device, these measurements data share the > > same time column. > > > > If we treat it as a table, the table name is deviceId, the columns are > > Timestamp, measurements name. This table should not contain null value. > > > > For example > > device1 > > time, s1, s2, s3 > > 1 1 2 3 > > 2 1 2 3 > > 3 1 2 3 > > > > (2) insertInBatch insert multiple rows, each row contains a timestamp, a > > deviceID and arbitrary measurements with values. Each row is independent. > > > > For example, > > row1: time, device1, s1, s2 > > row2: time, device2, s3, s4 > > > > So I plan to rename these methods. > > > > RowBatch -> SeriesBatch or ColumnBatch > > insertBatch -> insertSeriesBatch or ColumnBatch > > insertInBatch -> insertRows > > > > Does this look good to you? > > > > Thanks, > > ————————————————— > > Jialin Qiao > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > 乔嘉林 > > 清华大学 软件学院 > >
