Hi all, Though we introduced the feature that supporting time-based data partition, it may have some side-effect for query performance in some cases. So, I'd like to mark this feature as experimental and disable it by default. We can enable it by default until we fixed the performance issue in next version.
Then, I'd like to start to organize the change list of v0.10 with @Jialin. Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2020年5月21日周四 上午9:34写道： > Hi, > > I suggest to run a performance comparison for v0.9 and v0.10 first and > then start the release. > We are doing that. > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2020年5月20日周三 下午3:08写道： > >> Hi, >> >> > Are there any features left that one NEEDS in 0.10 that are currently >> in work? >> >> IMO, we do not need to wait for developing other features anymore before >> releasing v0.10.0, but we can "merge as many PRs as possible" especially >> for those bug-fix PRs. >> >> Best, >> >> ----------------------------------- >> Xiangdong Huang >> School of Software, Tsinghua University >> >> 黄向东 >> 清华大学 软件学院 >> >> >> Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2020年5月20日周三 下午2:33写道： >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I suggest to always to a release branch as best practice as it always >>> help you if you need to create a fix release like 0.10.1 (if you want to >>> keep working on features on master branch). >>> But yes I agree, we should try to merge as many PRs as possible. >>> >>> Are there any features left that one NEEDS in 0.10 that are currently in >>> work? >>> >>> Julian >>> >>> Am 20.05.20, 08:29 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The grafana issue has been fixed. >>> >>> As we have so many PRs opened now, we need to check when to fork a >>> new >>> branch rel/0.10. >>> >>> Actually, only one PR needs to be pay attention [1]. >>> >>> IMO, I want to merge it into the master ASAP to avoid more conflicts. >>> Otherwise, there will be too many differences between rel/0.10 and >>> master. >>> But as it modified many codes and not all of them are tested, I am >>> afraid >>> whether it brings unstable factors. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/1169 >>> >>> Best, >>> ----------------------------------- >>> Xiangdong Huang >>> School of Software, Tsinghua University >>> >>> 黄向东 >>> 清华大学 软件学院 >>> >>> >>> Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2020年5月18日周一 >>> 下午6:44写道： >>> >>> > Hey, >>> > >>> > that looks pretty cool indeed. >>> > Has anyone tested the IoTDB Grafana Bridge? >>> > I had issues with it at some point in master branch, not sure >>> about the >>> > latest version? >>> > >>> > But sounds really cool! >>> > >>> > Julian >>> > >>> > Am 18.05.20, 12:08 schrieb "Haonan Hou" <[email protected]>: >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > Right now the upgrade tool for upgrading IoTDB v0.9.x to v0.10 >>> has >>> > been developed. We have also finished the tests about it and >>> everything >>> > works great. I think it’s the right time to release the v0.10.0. >>> > >>> > Anyone hope to be the RM of 0.10.0? >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Haonan Hou >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院
