Hi,

Yes, keeping them consistent is better.

Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University

乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院

> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "孙泽嵩" <[email protected]>
> 发送时间: 2020-07-11 20:18:24 (星期六)
> 收件人: [email protected]
> 抄送: 
> 主题: Re: Naming of parameters in iotdb-engine.properties
> 
> Hi Jialin,
> 
> +1. Really good point.
> 
> Besides, should we keep the unit of same dimension being the same, for 
> example: ms for time, KB for capacity.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Zesong Sun
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
> 
> 孙泽嵩
> 清华大学 软件学院
> 
> > 2020年7月11日 15:08,Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 写道:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > I met a scenario that a user set the ttl wrongly as second precision, so he 
> > can not query the data.
> > 
> > 
> > I checked the parameter description in iotdb-engine.properties, it is 
> > described as this:
> > 
> > 
> > # Default TTL for storage groups that are not set TTL by statements, in ms. 
> > If not set (default),
> > # the TTL will be unlimited.
> > # Notice: if this property is changed, previous created storage group which 
> > are not set TTL will
> > # also be affected. And negative values are accepted, which means you can 
> > only insert future
> > # data.
> > # default_ttl=36000000
> > 
> > 
> > I think some users may do not read the descriptions, should we add the unit 
> > to the parameter name? E.g., sstable_size_in_mb in Cassandra.
> > 
> > 
> > We could rename the default_ttl to default_ttl_in_ms, so as to other 
> > parameters. 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> > 
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> 

Reply via email to