As I’m working on an edge system design, I’d suggest running IoTDB in Node-RED environment and use Grafana in Node-RED.
BTW, is there any Javascript connector ready for IoTDB? Shi Jinghai 发件人: Jialin Qiao<mailto:[email protected]> 发送时间: 2020年11月7日 12:22 收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint Hi, > I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. +1, could we combine the small handler with our RestAPI? Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" <[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2020-11-06 22:38:50 (星期五) > 收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > 抄送: > 主题: Re: Embdedded IoTDB Grafana Endpoint > > Hey, > > yes, to do it clean we could do it directly without Spring. Then ist just a very small handler. > Similar to what we already use optionally in the prometheus module. > > I dislike the idea of having spring in the server as well. > > Julian > > Am 06.11.20, 12:03 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > what do you think of an option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector > directly in IoTDBs Server Context (could be disbaled by default). > it is ok. > > But I think we need to prune some dependencies of Spring... It it too large > now.. (I remember it is ~ 20MB to add such a module) > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2020年11月6日周五 下午6:13写道： > > > Hi folks, > > > > as we just discussed the prometheus integration, what do you think of an > > option to run the SimpleJson Grafana Connector directly in IoTDBs Server > > Context (could be disbaled by default). > > This would make it way easier for users to just „look“ aat their IoTDB > > Data. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Julian > > > </[email protected]></[email protected]></[email protected]></[email protected]>
