Hi, yes, root is like "/" in Unix-like OS.

-----------------------------------
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University

 黄向东
清华大学 软件学院


Dhruv Garg <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 下午6:14写道:

> Hello Xiangdong,
>
> Thanks for confirming! One last question for now, all storage groups must
> start with "root" right? I cannot have storage groups like root1.demo,
> correct?
>
> Regards,
> dgargcs
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 15:37, Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dhruv,
> >
> > Yes you are right.  and IoTDB also supports join on timestamp across
> > storage groups.
> >
> > Q2: IoTDB does not support that now.
> > Current join looks like outer-join in RDBMS.
> > Supporting left join, right join and inner-join is not hard to implement,
> > just omit the rows that contain NULL.
> > (Better implementation will need CBO cost-based optimization, but IoTDB
> > lacks the statistics info for that.)
> >
> > Best,
> > -----------------------------------
> > Xiangdong Huang
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> >  黄向东
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >
> > Dhruv Garg <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 下午5:56写道:
> >
> > > Hello Xiangdong,
> > >
> > > Yes. Let me elaborate a bit about the join requirement. Suppose I want
> to
> > > do a join to print out values in root.demo.d1.m1 and root.demo.d2.m2
> for
> > a
> > > common time range say 2019-12-11 00:00:00 to 2020-12-18 23:59:59. It
> > should
> > > print out the last two rows from your table.
> > >
> > > In SQL, when we do a join, there are two different tables and then we
> do
> > a
> > > join based on some common column => root.demo.d1 is one table (has an
> > "m1"
> > > column) and another table root.demo.d2 (has an "m2" column). If I do a
> > join
> > > on d1 and d2 based on timestamp, it will return some rows containing m1
> > and
> > > m2 where timestamps are the same.
> > >
> > > I think the way to look at join queries in IoTDB is slightly different.
> > > Here, we have a storage group (root.demo) with different time-series
> > (d1.m1
> > > and d2.m2). For each insert in a storage group, I think IoTDB
> > automatically
> > > joins these time-series on timestamp since it assumes null values for
> > other
> > > time-series that were not given a value during insert.  For example,
> if I
> > > do an "insert root.demo.d2(timestamp,m2) values (2021-08-03T00:00:00,
> > > 2021)", it will also append NULL value for root.demo.d1.m1 for this
> > > timestamp.
> > >
> > > Thus, to do a join within a storage group for *any number* of
> time-series
> > > is straightforward. I think this is trivially done by just giving the
> > time
> > > range and time-series names => "select d1.m1, d2.m2 from root.demo
> where
> > > timestamp >= 2019-19-11T00:00:00".
> > >
> > > Next, I thought about a similar query across storage groups, say
> > root.demo1
> > > and root.demo2. Here as well, I can run a similar query, but only start
> > > from a higher level in the storage hierarchy, i.e. "root" alone.
> "select
> > > demo1.m1, demo2.m2 from root where timestamp >= 2019-19-11T00:00:00".
> > >
> > > Q1. Is my interpretation of join on timestamp correct for IoTDB?
> > >
> > > Q2. Is there a way to omit rows that return one or more null column
> > values
> > > in the result?
> > >
> > > PS: Sorry for the long email. I am exploring IoTDB for a research
> project
> > > and just want to be clear in my understanding.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > dgargcs
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 14:12, Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Dhruv,
> > > >
> > > > 1. Could you give me an example to describe what you want to query?
> > > > e.g., there are two time series:
> > > >
> > > > +-----------------------------+---------------+---------------+
> > > > |                         Time|root.demo.d1.m1|root.demo.d2.m2|
> > > > +-----------------------------+---------------+---------------+
> > > > |1970-01-01T08:00:00.001+08:00|            1.0|            2.0|
> > > > |2019-12-11T10:00:00.000+08:00|            1.0|            NULL|
> > > > |2020-12-18T11:45:14.519+08:00|            2.0|            2.0|
> > > > +-----------------------------+---------------+---------------+
> > > >
> > > > or,
> > > >
> > > > What you want to query? (you can consider it as a table in MySQL, and
> > > just
> > > > write the sqls you need in mysql.)
> > > >
> > > > 2. Ah, we are testing the performance of v0.12. maybe 2-3 weeks, I
> > think.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > -----------------------------------
> > > > Xiangdong Huang
> > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> > > >
> > > >  黄向东
> > > > 清华大学 软件学院
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dhruv Garg <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 下午4:11写道:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Xiangdong,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your response.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. I have the same use-case: I want to run a join query on two time
> > > > > series but I think I am getting the syntax wrong.
> > > > > I tried a few SQL-like join queries on IoTDB v0.11.2 and got the
> > > > following
> > > > > error:  "mismatched input 'JOIN' expecting {<EOF>, WHERE, ORDER,
> > > SLIMIT,
> > > > > LIMIT, OFFSET, SOFFSET, FILL, GROUP, DISABLE, ALIGN, ',', '.'}"
> > > > > Could you please refer me to some documentation or provide a simple
> > > > example
> > > > > join query for IoTDB?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. I am also excited to try out the cluster version. Is there an
> > > > > approximate timeline for v0.12 rollout?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > dgargcs
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 17:24, Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Dhruv,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Welcome!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. "join" for what requirements?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IoTDB supports JOIN two time series ON their timestamp, i.e.,
> time
> > > > series
> > > > > > alignment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2. I think the cluster version is coming... In the coming v0.12,
> I
> > > > think
> > > > > a
> > > > > > cluster version (that does
> > > > > > not support dynamically scale-out) will be released, and the
> > > scale-out
> > > > > > feature may be released in v0.13 or 0.14.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > -----------------------------------
> > > > > > Xiangdong Huang
> > > > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dhruv Garg <[email protected]> 于2021年3月2日周二 下午3:54写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am a researcher and a new user of IoTDB. I was excited when I
> > saw
> > > > the
> > > > > > > performance numbers of IoTDB compared to InfluxDB, and I have
> set
> > > it
> > > > up
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > a few workstations and a Raspberry Pi device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am becoming familiar with it and have a few queries:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >    1. Does IoTDB support Join queries? - I tried looking up
> some
> > > > > > >    documentation on it, but could not find any. If the feature
> is
> > > > > > > available,
> > > > > > >    could you please provide a sample query or the predicates
> for
> > > join
> > > > > > > queries?
> > > > > > >    2. I also browsed through the IoTDB Jira issues page. I saw
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > > > >    distributed / cluster version is being developed.
> > Approximately
> > > > how
> > > > > > much
> > > > > > >    time would it take to get a stable / working version of the
> > > > cluster
> > > > > > > IoTDB?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It would be great if someone can respond to my queries. I would
> > be
> > > > > > > waiting for a reply. Thanks in advance.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > dgargcs
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to