Re: distinguish the measuring of measurement Id and meansure name, as well as the path

Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:34:09 -0700 

Hi, Jialin


    Well, I think we should unify which word should be used in the name of the 
sensor in the code in the future, instead of making multiple synonyms.


Chao Wang


BONC, Ltd
[email protected]
On 3/23/2021 14:17，Jialin Qiao<[email protected]> wrote：
Hi,

measurement = measurementId = sensor

If a sensor or measurement represents a full path, it should be fixed.

I suggest using series for a full path and sensor for a sensor.

Thanks,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University

乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院

&gt; -----原始邮件-----
&gt; 发件人: "王超" <[email protected]>
&gt; 发送时间: 2021-03-23 10:52:49 (星期二)
&gt; 收件人: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
&gt; 抄送:
&gt; 主题: distinguish the measuring of measurement Id and meansure name, as well 
as the path
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Hi，all
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; There are many places in the current code that use measurement, 
measurement ID, sensor, etc. to represent the meaning of sensor name or path.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Sometimes when I look at the code, I don't know whether measurement 
represents its name or its path (including device information).
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Therefore, I suggest that we define or agree that if we use a name in a 
place, we use sensor; if we use a path, we use measurement ID to increase the 
readability and maintainability of the code.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Please leave your comments.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Chao Wang
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; BONC, Ltd
&gt; [email protected]
</[email protected]></[email protected]>

Reply via email to