Hi,

As we have more github repos(iotdb, iotdb-client-go, iotdb-web-workbench),
I would like to apply for enabling all Github Discussion from Infra.

Thanks,
—————————————————
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University

乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院


Mark Liu <[email protected]> 于2021年8月10日周二 上午8:01写道:

> +1
>
> Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 于2021年8月9日周一 下午9:35写道:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Github Discussion is enabled, enjoy! :D
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/iotdb/discussions
> >
> > Thanks,
> > —————————————————
> > Jialin Qiao
> > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> >
> > 乔嘉林
> > 清华大学 软件学院
> >
> >
> > Chao Wang <[email protected]> 于2021年8月9日周一 上午9:54写道:
> >
> > > +1
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > Chao Wang
> > > BONC ltd
> > > [email protected]
> > > On 8/9/2021 09:40,Houliang Qi<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > ---------------------------------------
> > > Houliang Qi
> > > BONC, Ltd
> > >
> > >
> > > On 08/9/2021 09:19,李萌<[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Good idea, but we need to see if it meets the apache regulations
> first  I
> > > think.
> > >
> > > On 2021/08/07 02:43:35, Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Github Discussion is a forum for the community to collaborate around
> open
> > > source projects [1]. You might consider it as a replacement of
> > > [email protected].
> > >
> > > I noticed Apache Couchdb has been already using it [2]
> > >
> > > I'd like to apply a Github discussion for the IoTDB community, it could
> > be
> > > a replacement for slack, WeChat group, QQ group...
> > >
> > > what do you think?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.blog/2020-05-06-new-from-satellite-2020-github-codespaces-github-discussions-securing-code-in-private-repositories-and-more/
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > —————————————————
> > > Jialin Qiao
> > > School of Software, Tsinghua University
> > >
> > > 乔嘉林
> > > 清华大学 软件学院
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Mark Liu
>

Reply via email to