BigEndian +1

—————————————————
Jialin Qiao


Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 于2021年9月29日周三 上午8:39写道:

> Hi,
>
> So we will keep BigEndian, right?
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
>  黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院
>
> Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午6:47写道:
> >
> > Big +1 for fixed Endianness!
> >
> > I think a C implementation would also be beneficial for something like a
> sqlite interface (see my thread here
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd4d0296e0fef9c1c822f605f641d829047e0932429499a5e05667b8e%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E)
> as it could be wrapped to whatever language we like basically (again
> sqlite...).
> >
> > Best
> > Julian
> >
> > Von: Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]>
> > Datum: Montag, 27. September 2021 um 13:06
> > An: dev <[email protected]>
> > Betreff: Re: Endianess.
> > Hello IOTDBers,
> > Chris I agree with you, everything shall be Network Byte Order(
> > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=hosts-network-byte-order) by
> > the first writing. Thank you. I will look at your C code for review,
> > The first stage is to support natively TsFile.  At this moment we've just
> > unmolded code however looking at Apache Arrow codebase is useful for the
> > progress.  After the ts file we'll look together at a server, my idea is
> to
> > have in the long term a lower latency product that scales better than
> Java
> > ones (iotdb-native). But for the moment it's just a dream, so baby steps
> > and hard work as usual.
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Giorgio.
>

Reply via email to