+1 for apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage
—————————————————
Jialin Qiao
Apache IoTDB PMC


HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com.invalid> 于2022年5月13日周五 21:09写道:

> thanks&nbsp;Skywalking community.&nbsp;i feel should be
> apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for
> iotdb,separate from apache/iotdb.
>
>
>
> ---Original---
> From: "Xiangdong Huang"<saint...@gmail.com&gt;
> Date: Fri, May 13, 2022 17:37 PM
> To: "dev"<dev@iotdb.apache.org&gt;;
> Subject: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Skywalking community is discussing about only keeping self-implemented
> storage layer.
>
> IMO, I think it is not a bad decision to remove 3rd-part implementataion
> from skywalking's main repo.&nbsp; Because we can decide which version of
> skywalking we can maintain according to the community developers' time.
> However, IoTDB-skywalking integration has its meaning and we should keep to
> maintain the integration.
>
> The discussion is, where to put the integration to?
>
> a new code repo like: apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage?
> or into IoTDB's repo like apache/iotdb/skywalking?
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059
>
> Best,
> -----------------------------------
> Xiangdong Huang
> School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
> &nbsp;黄向东
> 清华大学 软件学院

Reply via email to