It's the constraint that matters and the length 64 is sufficient for most cases.
冯 庆新 <[email protected]> 于2022年11月18日周五 18:02写道： > Agree with ‘add constraint to the length of database name’,but Can we > choose a value greater than 64? > > 发件人: Jialin Qiao<mailto:[email protected]> > 发送时间: 2022年11月18日 16:15 > 收件人: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > 主题: Re: Add constraint to the length of database name > > +1 > ————————————————— > Jialin Qiao > Apache IoTDB PMC > > 周钰坤 <[email protected]> 于2022年11月18日周五 15:44写道： > > > > Hi, > > > > We want to add constraint to the length of database name, as most > > popular database systems have such constraint as well, for example the > > length of database name in Mysql shall not exceed 64. Currently, the > > maximum length of database name, including "root.", is *64* and it is > > immutable. Such constraint can help avoid some bugs of database and > region > > management, since we use database names in the directory name, which > shall > > not exceed the max name length defined by file system. > > > > best regards > > ------------------------ > > Yukun Zhou, Tsinghua University > >
