Hi Folks, I sort of missed most of it as git tends to keep the moved directories, if there’s something in there … as they all contained “target” directories, I just noticed the cleaned-up structure of the project … awesome work.
I took the liberty of applying the same structural changes on the reactor (No worries, in a branch) There I introduced intermediate sub-parent poms. Also did I clean up the pom structure, where it needed some cleaning up. Now in IntelliJ (and probably every other Maven-Enabled IDE) the project should also be structured nicely, and the modules have equally formatted names. The changes should not have any real impact on the project and the build. In general, I would prefer adjusting the artifact-ids to replicate the module structure, but this is already a lot better, and I wasn’t sure of the implications of artifact renaming in upstream builds. Chris
