I would love this.
I currently use a batch file to build a fat jar (just for JDBC). Thanks Trevor Hart ---- On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:42:40 +1300 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote --- Hi all, so right now, I keep on having the issue, that I keep on needing to re-build IoTDB, as I forgot to enable the “jar-with-dependencies” profile when building the JDBC driver. I would assume, that when building a native Java client, someone would possibly prefer using the session API and that JDBC is more needed when using IoTDB from a JDBC enabled client. So, I think it would be better to have the fat-jar enabled per default. What do you others think? Chris
