Hi Zihan, I think you can submit a pr to iotdb-extras repo to upgrade the dependencies.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2026 at 10:54 PM Zh D <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yuan, > > I ran the iotdb-extras JDBC consumers against one server built from > 7aa8e63a7c6, once with the 2.0.11 release driver and once with the > driver from that commit. > > Tested: examples/mybatis-generator (IoTDBGeneratorIT and the generator > run), examples/mybatisplus-generator (IoTDBMapperIT and CodeGenerator), > and, in the tree dialect, connectors/zeppelin-interpreter and > connectors/grafana-connector. mybatis-generator and mybatis-support do > not depend on iotdb-jdbc. > > None of the listed behavior changes breaks these modules. All ITs pass > with both drivers, and the generated Java and mapper XML are the same, > with one change for the better: for tables with a COMMENT, MyBatis > Generator now writes the table's own comment. With 2.0.11, getTables > ignored the table name and the generator used the first table's one. > > One thing for later: extras manages libthrift 0.23.0 and TsFile 2.4.0 > to match 2.0.11. With those, the client from 7aa8e63a7c6 fails on its > first connection with NoSuchMethodError, because of the Thrift 0.25.0 > bump (#18793). So when extras moves to a release that contains it, > those two versions have to move too; 0.25.0 and 2.5.0 work with both > drivers. > > Zihan >
