That makes sense. But it wasn't obvious. When I go back to that code
I'll think about it further.
On 25/03/13 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote:
well, no, it would be field.titleString(null)... meaning that the
referenced object should be rendered in the context of no parent adapter.
I added this idea of a context for evaluating titles in ISIS-364 a week or
two ago. It works rather well in the UI, ensuring that the title shown
in parented collections doesn't unnecessarily include the title component
of the parent itself.
I don't mind the titleString() being undeprecated, if you want, though. As
I say... it isn't the same as field.titleString(field), it's
field.titleString(null)
Cheers
Dan
On 25 March 2013 12:21, Robert Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
In the Mongo code there is a line that gets an object's title from the
adapter using
field.titleString()
but it is flagged as deprecated and the suggested new use (from line 58 in
ObjectAdapter) would require me to say
field.titleString(field)
which seems a bit silly to me. Has someone got a bit deprecation happy :-)?
Rob
