[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Haywood updated ISIS-325:
-----------------------------

    Fix Version/s: core-2.0.0
    
> Field validation annotations should be on setters or fields instead of on the 
> getters.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-325
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-325
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.1.0
>            Reporter: Minto van der Sluis
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: core-2.0.0
>
>
> Below is the discussion on the mailing list
> On 2 February 2013 15:29, Minto van der Sluis wrote:
> In the quickstart ToDo application I just noticed the following:
>     @RegEx( validation = "\\w[@&:\\-\\,\\.\\+ \\w]*" )
>     // words, spaces and selected punctuation
>     @MemberOrder( sequence = "2" )
>     public String getDescription() {
>     ...
> To me it seems like validation is specified on the getter method. Is
> this correct? Shouldn't this be specified on the setter or the member
> field instead?
> On 3 February 2013 16:04, Dan Haywoord wrote:
> I agree that it might seem a bit confusing, but at the moment all the
> FacetFactory's only ever read the getter method for properties.
> I don't see anything in principal for extending the FacetFactory's to also
> look at fields and setters; in this particular case I could well imagine
> that someone might expect the annotation to live on the setter.  The same
> is true for annotations such as @MaxLength.
> Another benefit of having the FacetFactory's look at the fields is that
> then Lombok [1] could be configured.  This would save a lot of boilerplate,
> as I know you know.
> Making the change is relative straightforward, it's just a matter of doing
> a lot "grunt" work to quite a lot of existing FacetFactory's.  I wouldn't
> have any objection to applying any patches received, though.
> And if you want to raise a ticket for this idea, please go ahead.
> Cheers
> Dan
> [1] http://projectlombok.org/

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to