[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Haywood resolved ISIS-536.
------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    
> Provide the capability to disable concurrency checking in core through a 
> thread-local
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-536
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-536
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.2.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: core-1.3.0
>
>
> In some situations it may be necessary to temporarily disable concurrency 
> checking.  
> One example is when running integration test fixtures, where we simply want 
> to delete all existing data, and don't care about any existing state.
> However, another might be to get better control of callbacks from the JDO 
> objectstore.  For example, on the preDelete callback to the 
> FrameworkSynchronizer, we've seen concurrency exceptions, but these might be 
> as the a result of JDO bumping up the version of the adapter being deleted.  
> Further research is required here.  One possibility though is that the 
> preDelete might require checking to be temporarily disabled for the thread, 
> so that when the callback fires, it knows not to do the concurrency check.
> This ticket is to provide this thread local capability.  Analysis of the 
> codebase shows that - when configured with Wicket and the JDO objectstore - 
> the ConcurrencyException is thrown either via AdapterManager, or in the 
> Framework Synchronizer.  Both of these should honour the value of the thread 
> local.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to