[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13829883#comment-13829883
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-600:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 6084ae6d0f072fe2134220dbab7ab02dfeaf59ac in branch refs/heads/master 
from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=6084ae6 ]

ISIS-600, ISIS-601: paged facet in layout JSON

along with internal refactoring of format of properties file.


> Change format of facet properties file, scope by member then facet
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-600
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.3.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: core-1.4.0
>
>
> Although layout facets are most likely to be represented in json, they can 
> also be loaded from a properties file.  Internally the json is converted to a 
> bunch of properties, and it is the properties that are parsed and used to 
> create facets.
> Since this stuff was originally done for the memberOrder and 
> memberOrderLayout facets, the properties file syntax is currently:
> memberOrder.<memberName>.name=
> memberOrder.<memberName>.sequence=
> and
> memberOrderLayout.columnSpans=3,4,0,5
> memberOrderLayout.columnSpans.left=General,Detail
> etc
> This ticket is to invert this ordering, in preparation for other facets being 
> added, and to distinguish member-level facets from class-level facets.  
> eg:
> member.<memberName>.memberOrder.name=
> member.<memberName>.memberOrder.sequence=
> and
> memberOrderLayout.columnSpans=3,4,0,5
> memberOrderLayout.columnSpans.left=General,Detail
> The format of the JSON file is unchanged.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to