On 4 April 2014 20:55, Dileepa Jayakody <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Qn: Why is there a 1:1 relationship between Reputation and > ReputationValue? > > > > ReputationValue entity encapsulates the result of the reputation analysis > process. > It can simply be a value type (a reputation score). And I think each > Reputation object should have a corresponding reputation value, that's why > I added it as a 1:1 relationship. Any ideas for a better model? > > In which case, it's probably worth indicating that ReputationValue is a value object, eg through an archetype. Even better, if everything else is an entity, then simply show "value:ReputationValue" as an attribute of Reputation.
