[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14031518#comment-14031518
]
Dan Haywood commented on ISIS-810:
----------------------------------
As the above commit shows, I've removed the wizard but committed in a separate
branch (ISIS-810).
If we decide to keep the wizard in, we can just kill that branch.
In the meantime, though, I have also pulled out the wizard in to a separate
stand-alone component, see https://github.com/danhaywood/isis-wicket-wizard.
> Remove Wizard and Wicket viewer implementation on basis that shouldn't
> constrain programming model to this extent.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-810
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Fix For: viewer-wicket-1.6.0, core-1.6.0
>
>
> ie, the work committed in ISIS-800 and ISIS-807.
> Instead, should be a separate "add-on"?
> Background:
> - Jeroen made this suggestion; he thinks that the Wizard interface is too
> prescriptive
> - However Oscar thinks that we should provide a default implementation.
> ~~~
> NB: if we do decide to remove the Wizard from IsIs, then Jeroen and I have
> registered the "isisaddons.org" domain and the github.com/isisaddons as a
> domain home for such add-ons.
> The idea is to nurture something similar what Apache Wicket do with their
> "wicketstuff" companion site. All of my com.danhaywood wicket extensions
> could then move to isisaddons.org.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
