[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14365091#comment-14365091
]
Martin Grigorov edited comment on ISIS-1098 at 3/17/15 1:19 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
I think the ***Layout annotations should be extended.
Or even introduce a special annotation for temporal properties/parameters ?!
Because the JS widget has many settings:
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/Options/.
For ISIS-1095 I needed just:
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/Options/#viewmode
You can see it in action at
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/#view-mode. With "years"
viewMode the picker asks you first to select the year, then the month and
finally the date. This is much easier for selecting a birthdate than trying to
navigate with the default view
(http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/#minimum-setup)
was (Author: mgrigorov):
I think the ***Layout annotations should be extended.
Or even introduce a special annotation for temporal properties/parameters ?!
Because the JS widget has many settings:
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/Options/.
For ISIS-1095 I needed just:
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/Options/#viewmode
You can see it in action at
http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/#view-mode. With "years"
viewMode the picker asks you first to select the year, then the month and
finally the date. This is much easier to selecting a birthdate than trying to
navigate with the default view
(http://eonasdan.github.io/bootstrap-datetimepicker/#minimum-setup)
> Extend @Property and @Parameter facets to provide additional hints (ie make
> ISIS-1095 into formal API)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-1098
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1098
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: core-1.8.0
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1095 for background.
> arguably it should be @PropertyLayout and @ParameterLayout annotations that
> we extend, rather than @Property and @Parameter
> ... depends on how "intrinsic" to the domain this hint is.
> Opinions?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
