[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Haywood resolved ISIS-534.
------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 2.0.0)
                   1.10.0

> Does JDO Objectstore ever need to create DataNucleusUpdateObjectCommand 
> commands?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-534
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.2.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>             Fix For: 1.10.0
>
>
> Following on from ISIS-533, I'm not sure there's ever any reason for the 
> DataNucleusUpdateObjectCommand to do anything, therefore for it to be 
> created.  The Isis core can, instead, merely rely upon DN's built-in object 
> dirtying.
> This ticket is to explore this issue and perhaps to make the objectChanged() 
> method - that creates the Update command - into a no-op if the JDO 
> objectstore is configured.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to