[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dan Haywood updated ISIS-1228:
------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.10.0)
                   1.11.0

The nextTransaction() in IntegrationTestAbstract uses IsisSystemForTest.get() - 
a threadlocal - to reach into the framework and get hold of the 
IsisTransactionManager for the current PersistenceSession.

This isn't exposed as a domain service that could be injected into a 
FixtureScript.

So I think this ticket really should be to provide that functionality.  the 
IntegrationTestAbstract (and associated ScenarioExecutionForIntegrationTest) 
could then be simplified/refactored.

> Introduce nextTransaction() into fixture scripts.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-1228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: core-1.8.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> originally raised by Oscar:
> When using FixtureScripts, there can be many actions that, on the real world, 
> are execute in different time contexts.
> For example, a user creates an Account on the webapp and after that executes 
> different actions.
> That’s relevant if using the queryResultsCache service (or the new planned 
> “@Action” annotation extension) because the results previously created (i.e., 
> the Account) might be available on the cache.
> So perhaps some mechanism like the nextTransation() method might be also 
> introduced on FixtureScripts.
> What do you think?
> ~~~~~~~
> Dan's reply:
> Makes sense.
> There is a nextTransaction() method in the AbstractIntegTest class, you could 
> see how that is implemented and see if it can be adapted?
> Or, another idea is that the framework could run each FixtureScript 
> automatically in a separate transaction; that would be a better simulation of 
> a sequence of user interactions?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to