[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15142432#comment-15142432
]
Jörg Rade commented on ISIS-569:
--------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building Isis Unit Test Support 1.12.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO]
[INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.8:tree (default-cli) @
isis-core-unittestsupport ---
[INFO] org.apache.isis.core:isis-core-unittestsupport:jar:1.12.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.ops4j.pax.tipi:org.ops4j.pax.tipi.junit:jar:4.12.0.1:compile
[INFO] | \-
org.ops4j.pax.tipi:org.ops4j.pax.tipi.hamcrest.core:jar:1.3.0.1:compile
[INFO] +- org.picocontainer:picocontainer:jar:2.15:compile
[INFO] +- org.jmock:jmock:jar:2.6.0:compile
[INFO] | +- org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:jar:1.1:compile
[INFO] | \- org.hamcrest:hamcrest-library:jar:1.1:compile
[INFO] +- org.jmock:jmock-junit4:jar:2.6.0:compile
> Fix JMock to support JDK7 (JavassistImposteriser)
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-569
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-569
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: core-1.2.0
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Fix For: core-1.5.0
>
>
> Isis standardized on using JMock a while back, however as a library it
> doesn't seem to be keeping up.
> Specifically, its mocking of classes depends on cglib 2.x (and therefore asm
> 3.x), which conflicts with cglib 3/ asm 4.x (required for JDK 7).
> Candidates to replace it are mockito and jmockit. Personally I don't much
> like mockito; jmockit comes out well in this comparison:
> https://blog.42.nl/articles/mockito-powermock-vs-jmockit/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
