[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15169140#comment-15169140
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-993:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 62f69d173430efa00c0f06df84ba33aac1c188c1 in isis's branch 
refs/heads/ISIS-993 from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=62f69d1 ]

Merge branch 'master' into ISIS-993

# Conflicts:
#       
core/applib/src/main/java/org/apache/isis/applib/services/dto/Dto_downloadXml.java
#       
core/applib/src/main/java/org/apache/isis/applib/services/jaxb/CatalogingSchemaOutputResolver.java


> Show different object members on multiple tabs
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-993
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-993
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core, Core: Viewer: Wicket
>    Affects Versions: viewer-wicket-1.7.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> 4-jan-2016:
> Divide the screen into two halves.
> All properties in separate tabs.
> Each collection in its own tabs.
> ~~~
> as per [1] mailing list thread.
> The example in the mailng list splits up the object's properties/collections 
> (contributed or otherwise) into two different sets of tabs... but as a first 
> pass I think a single row of tabs ought to suffice.
> We also need to be mindful that we may want to use tabs as a metaphor for 
> multiple opened objects (as a replacement for bookmarks), so this is another 
> reason for a single row of tabs. 
> To support this would require extensions to @DomainObjectLayout or equivalent 
> xxx.layout.json file.
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/merftvqoiy6ht3kq



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to