[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15190813#comment-15190813
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-1228:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 91d25c45f033efcb388d26f22391680e16499235 in isis's branch
refs/heads/ISIS-1228 from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=91d25c4 ]
ISIS-1228: breaking out new domain services from DomainObjectContainer.
> Introduce nextTransaction() into fixture scripts.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-1228
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: core-1.8.0
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> originally raised by Oscar:
> When using FixtureScripts, there can be many actions that, on the real world,
> are execute in different time contexts.
> For example, a user creates an Account on the webapp and after that executes
> different actions.
> That’s relevant if using the queryResultsCache service (or the new planned
> “@Action” annotation extension) because the results previously created (i.e.,
> the Account) might be available on the cache.
> So perhaps some mechanism like the nextTransation() method might be also
> introduced on FixtureScripts.
> What do you think?
> ~~~~~~~
> Dan's reply:
> Makes sense.
> There is a nextTransaction() method in the AbstractIntegTest class, you could
> see how that is implemented and see if it can be adapted?
> Or, another idea is that the framework could run each FixtureScript
> automatically in a separate transaction; that would be a better simulation of
> a sequence of user interactions?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
