Hi Andi good catch.
I think we should change the docs to match the code rather than the other way around; otherwise we run the risk of changing the behaviour of the framework which might cause issues. What happens with auditing, is there a discrepancy there too, I wonder? Thx Dan On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 21:08 Andi Huber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I'm in the processes of fixing some tests in module metamodel on the > 'master' branch. > > If I interpret the doc [1] correctly, then we have a discrepancy between > doc and current implementation: > > Given (invalid or missing) configuration property > isis.services.publish.objects=foobar > > according to the doc should be picked up by the framework equivalently to > isis.services.publish.objects=all > > If there is no configuration property in isis.properties then publishing > is automatically enabled for domain objects. > > > But in code we do the opposite (isis.services.publish.objects=none). > Which way should it be? > > Cheers, Andi > > [1] > https://isis.apache.org/guides/rgant/rgant.html#_rgant-DomainObject_publishing >
