OK done.

If you have a clone of the Apache Isis repo, then do the following:

git checkout -b temp
git fetch
git branch -f master origin/master      # moves local master branch to
point to same commit as origin/master
git checkout master
git branch -D temp

There's also now a new 'v2' branch

Thanks
Dan




On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 at 16:11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Since there have been no objections to this, I'm going to switch around
> the branches:
>
> master   becomes  v2
> maint-1.16.2   becomes  master
>
> Thx
> Dan
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 at 17:38, Andi Huber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Comment inline ...
>>
>> On 2018/09/06 21:08:23, Dan Haywood <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Happy to use 'v2' for 2.0.0 development.
>> >
>> > Any other opinions?  I'll look to switch after the weekend otherwise (ie
>> > give it 72 hours)
>> >
>> > Ta
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 07:42 Andi Huber <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thx Dan.
>> > > I'd like to propose a very short name for the main branch to use for
>> > > version 2:
>> > >
>> > > 'v2'
>> > >
>> > > Cheers, Andi!
>> > >
>> > > On 2018/09/05 06:32:25, Dan Haywood <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hi folks,
>> > > >
>> > > > At the moment the "master" branch holds the development that Andi is
>> > > > leading for 2.0.0-M2.  We also have "maint-1.16.2" - which is where
>> any
>> > > > development for a future 1.16.3 goes on.
>> > > >
>> > > > However, our website documentation is published from
>> "maint-1.16.2", but
>> > > if
>> > > > we get doc pull requests (via the "Edit this page") then they are
>> raised
>> > > > against "master.  We recently had a few doc PRs which Andi applied,
>> but
>> > > it
>> > > > occurs to me that these won't see "the light of day" unless I
>> cherry pick
>> > > > them back to "maint-1.16.2" branch and re-release.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, is this something that could be configured, in a
>> way that PRs regarding the adoc files get filed against an arbitrary
>> branch? Reason is, that I just merged a PR - kindly provided by Gabriel -
>> against 'master', which was actual code! (and by the way: Hurray!!!)
>>
>> > > >
>> > > > Realistically we're going to be working on 2.0.0-Mn milestone
>> releases
>> > > for
>> > > > a good few months yet, so I'd like to switch the branches back, ie:
>> > > >
>> > > > master is renamed to dev-2.0.0  (say ... or maybe something easier
>> to
>> > > type,
>> > > > eg "develop")
>> > > > maint-1.16.2 is renamed back to master
>> > > >
>> > > > I mentioned this to Andi offline, he's happy with the proposal, but
>> > > > obviously this is a discussion to be had publicly on this dev@
>> mailing
>> > > list.
>> > > >
>> > > > Any concerns, please reply, otherwise will use lazy consensus.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thx
>> > > > Dan
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is from Haywood Associates Ltd (Registered
>> Number
>> > > > 3525455) and it and its attachments may be confidential and are
>> intended
>> > > > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.  Any
>> > > > unauthorised use or dissemination of this communication is strictly
>> > > > prohibited. Any information provided to Haywood Associates Ltd
>> shall be
>> > > > retained and used in accordance with our Privacy Statement at
>> > > > http://www.haywood-associates.co.uk/privacy.  If you have received
>> this
>> > > > communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>> return
>> > > > e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > --
>> > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is from Haywood Associates Ltd (Registered
>> Number
>> > 3525455) and it and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
>> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.  Any
>> > unauthorised use or dissemination of this communication is strictly
>> > prohibited. Any information provided to Haywood Associates Ltd shall be
>> > retained and used in accordance with our Privacy Statement at
>> > http://www.haywood-associates.co.uk/privacy.  If you have received this
>> > communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
>> > e-mail message and delete all copies of the original communication.
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to