[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16933117#comment-16933117
]
Andi Huber commented on ISIS-2010:
----------------------------------
Hmm, maybe this is open for discussion:
# The Singleton/Service stereotypes are information directed at the Inversion
of Control Container (IoCC). Meaning, we want instances of this classes to be
inject-able into our domain-objects. (But these won't contribute to the
meta-model.)
# The DomainService annotation however, might be interpreted as an intent to
contribute something to the meta-model.
However any 'DomainService' annotated class is also regarded 'inject-able'.
Meaning it is managed by the IoCC.
> Define a formal API for programmatic interactions between modules
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-2010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2010
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.16.2
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.3
>
>
> One idea:
> - NatureOfService.DOMAIN_API vs NatureOfService.DOMAIN (latter interpreted as
> IMPL)
> For the API, can wrap (and perhaps are auto-wrapped)
> For the IMPL, are not wrapped, and don't introspect the methods to create
> actions.
> It's not clear to me which of the Isis services should be DOMAIN_API vs
> DOMAIN.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
