[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17271921#comment-17271921
]
Andi Huber commented on ISIS-2498:
----------------------------------
Place to start is the MixinFacetAbstract with its (holder) field search
function. Get rid of that!
> Remove requirement for Mixins to actually store their holder.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-2498
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-2498
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Isis Core
> Reporter: Andi Huber
> Assignee: Andi Huber
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M6
>
>
> Keep our programming model with mixins as it is (contract by constructor),
> but don't strictly require mixins to actually store the holder that they are
> associated with. We only require this now, because of implementation details
> of the framework.
> Currently we do a reflective field search in the mixins to get hold of the
> holder instance which is not guaranteed to work due to potential ambiguity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)