FYI: From: Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]> Subject: [marketing] Bundling of extensions in OpenOffice.org Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:33:55 +0200
> Hi, > > in last ESC meeting > (http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ESC_meeting_minutes_20090309) > there was the item "Define Criteria when to bundle extensions" on the > agenda. > > Based on the proposal > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ESC/Criteria_for_bundling_extensions > we got the following requirements from technical point of view: > > Extensions should: > > * be localized > * documented, online help available > * QAd, Feature must be complete and without serious bugs > * consistent with the UI of the core product and other bundled > extensions > * does not need limited UI resources, and is not considered core > functionality at the same time > * a11y compliant > > There was the agreement that also the marketing and user experience > team might want to add important criteria and rules upon this so that > finally the release status meeting is able to accept proposals for > bundling and is able to decide based on these rules. > > Simple rules might be something like "must have x downloads per week, > at least a rating of y stars, and z ratings at all". But I will leave > it to the experts to discuss such criteria. > > From my point of view I'll add the requirement that the source code > for bundled extensions need to be in the OpenOffice.org source code > repository to get the bundling done in a automated manner so that they > will be LGPL license compliant and follow the accepted guidelines of > the project. > > Martin > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >
pgpfp29ADWIPz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
