hi mark thanks for reporting this issue! it's indeed a bug. i fixed it in svn r389129.
cheers stefan On 3/25/06, Mark Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure if this matters (as in, for all I know, its a hiccup in > the JVM and nothing to do with Jackrabbit at all), but I just got a > very strange error in the test phase of the build process: > > [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 0.359 sec > [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.lock.TestAll > [junit] Tests run: 23, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 6.813 sec > [junit] Exception in thread "Thread-4" > java.util.NoSuchElementException > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap > $ReferenceEntrySetIterator.nextEntry(AbstractReferenceMap.java:772) > [junit] at > org.apache.commons.collections.map.AbstractReferenceMap > $ReferenceValuesIterator.next(AbstractReferenceMap.java:829) > [junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.shutdown > (RepositoryImpl.java:858) > [junit] at > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository.shutdown > (BindableRepository.java:257) > [junit] at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepository > $1.run(BindableRepository.java:133) > [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.nodetype.TestAll > [junit] Tests run: 99, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 24.768 sec > [junit] Running org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.observation.TestAll > [junit] Tests run: 40, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: > 10.539 sec > > There were no errors that I could find before this, or after it, and > no mention was made of it in any JUnit output files or log files that > I could find. At the end, maven reported a successful build. > > I'm not particularly worried about it... a build I did just a few > minutes before had no errors. The only thing that changed between the > two was the removal of some logging statements in > CustomNodeTypeConfig (I was trying to track down a null input stream > exception). > > On one hand I thought about dismissing this out of hand since it > doesn't seem to be reproducible (I tried a few times), but on the > other, some of the nastiest bugs I've ever had to track down were > sporadic and only showed up once in a very long while. > > Mark >
