hi jukka
Good point. I still think that Roy's point about Jackrabbit branding
applies, so adding the jackrabbit prefix would make sense.
sure. my concerns didn't touch the jackrabbit prefix.
only the 'webdav' part :))
Just adding the prefix (and a version number to the war) would give us:
jackrabbit-jcr-server-1.0-src.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-webdav-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-client-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-jcr-server-1.0.jar
jackrabbit-server-1.0.war
Would you be OK with this?
yes. fine with me.
perhaps there are simply too much things in a
single project.
Agreed, it might be clearer to better separate the subprojects, but
there's no point rushing that.
oh no :))... i just wanted to explain my concerns. in
addition i think this should be a point to be addressed
in the future. no pressure whatsoever.
the project simply turned from the original 'jcr-server'
for general jcr-remoting (dav as an example only) into multi
target thing, with the 'simple server' getting a project
of its own (not so simple any more). ;)
kind regards
angela
