Hi, Thanks for your review. I just do like this because I don't want to change the interface. Like I do, that will not broke the compatibility with someone who create his own IOManager or IOhandler. But if you don't care about this, yes, your design is better.
> - The 'iohandler' elements should rather be children of the iomanager. they > don't have a meaning Yes, sure, it will be a better design. I do like this because you don't have to define a IOManager, you can just add some IOHandler. > > if nobody objects i would modify the config and iohandler/manager accordingly. Ok, Jérémi -- Blog: http://www.jeremi.info LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724 Project Manager XWiki: http://www.xwiki.org skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
